Gerald (“Jerry”) Gault was a 15 year-old accused of making an obscene telephone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook, on June 8, 1964. After Mrs. Cook filed a complaint, Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were arrested and taken to the Children’s Detention Home.
What was the Gault decision?
8–1 decision for Gault
The proceedings of the Juvenile Court failed to comply with the Constitution. The Court held that the proceedings for juveniles had to comply with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What is the significance of the In re Gault decision?
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that juvenile criminal defendants are entitled to Due Process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
What did Gault say in the phone call?
In Arizona, in 1964, Gerald Francis Gault, age 15, and Ronald Lewis made an obscene phone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook. The obscene phone call included the following statements: “Do you give any?” “Do you have big bombers?” and “Are your cherries ripe today?” Incensed, Mrs.
What right did the Gault case give to juveniles?
In re Gault et al. Juveniles tried for crimes in delinquency proceedings should have the right of due process protected by the 5th Amendment, including the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.
What is the Gault case and what did it establish?
It established the constitutional right to legal counsel for children facing delinquency proceedings. The case involved a 14-year-old boy, who was sentenced to seven years in a juvenile detention center after making a lewd phone call. Today, the right to counsel is assured under the law.
What was wrong with the Gault case?
Gault’s commitment to the State Industrial School was a violation of the 6th Amendment since he had had been denied the right to an attorney, had not been formally notified of the charges against him, had not been informed of his right against self-incrimination, and had not been provided an opportunity to confront his
How did the Gault case change juvenile justice?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling issued on May 15, 1967, In re Gault, found for the first time that juvenile court cases are adversarial criminal proceedings. That gave youthful offenders the right to a defense lawyer, formal rules of criminal procedure and a chance to present their side of the story in an open hearing.
How did In Re Gault impact society?
The In Re Gault case is important because it forever changed the way constitutional due process and habeas corpus protections are interpreted in juvenile criminal cases by requiring defendants under the age of 18 to be provided with the same constitutional guarantees when accused of crimes.
When was the Gault decision?
1967
The requirements of due process in juvenile delinquent proceedings handed down by the Supreme Court in the Gault decision in 1967 included: (1) the right to adequate and timely notice of charges to both the child and parents; (2) notification of the child and parents of the right to representation of counsel or right …
What was the result of the Gault decision quizlet?
What was the result in the Gault case? the ruling was that juveniles have the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to the assistance of counsel in case with the possibility of a decision to put the juvenile in confinement in a locked facility.
What was the importance of the Gault case about juveniles?
Today is the 50th Anniversary of In Re Gault, the U.S. Supreme Court case that granted children the right to counsel and other key due process protections when facing delinquency charges in juvenile court.