What is the Physical Units Method?

In the realm of cost accounting, the physical units method, also known as the quantitative unit method, is a widely used approach for allocating joint costs among various products produced through a common production process. This method relies on the measurement units of the products to distribute the total joint costs. The selection of an appropriate allocation basis is crucial to ensure accurate and fair cost allocation.

Allocation Basis

The physical units method employs a straightforward allocation basis centered around the measurement units of the joint products. These units can vary depending on the industry and the nature of the products. Common examples include tons, gallons, pounds, or feet. The significance of using a common unit of measurement lies in ensuring consistency and comparability in the allocation process.

Measurable Products

A fundamental requirement for applying the physical units method is that all joint products must be quantifiable using a common unit of measurement. In cases where direct measurement is not feasible, conversion to a common denominator becomes necessary. This conversion involves expressing the products in terms of a standard unit that allows for meaningful comparison.

Allocation Calculation

The allocation calculation in the physical units method follows a systematic approach. The total joint costs are distributed to each product based on its proportionate share of the total quantity produced. The formula used for this calculation is:

(Quantity of each product / Total quantity of all products) * Total joint costs

This formula ensures that the joint costs are allocated in a manner that reflects the relative contribution of each product to the overall production output.

Example Calculation

To illustrate the practical application of the physical units method, consider a scenario with four joint products (A, B, C, and D) and a total joint production cost of $120,000. The quantities produced for each product are as follows:

Product A: 20,000 units

Product B: 15,000 units

Product C: 10,000 units

Product D: 15,000 units

Using the formula mentioned above, the allocated costs for each product can be calculated:

Product A: (20,000 / 60,000) * $120,000 = $40,000

Product B: (15,000 / 60,000) * $120,000 = $30,000

Product C: (10,000 / 60,000) * $120,000 = $20,000

Product D: (15,000 / 60,000) * $120,000 = $30,000

Conclusion

The physical units method offers a practical and straightforward approach for allocating joint costs based on the measurement units of the products. Its simplicity and ease of application make it a popular choice among businesses. However, it is important to recognize that different cost allocation methods exist, and the selection of the most appropriate method depends on the specific circumstances and the nature of the joint production process.

Sources:

  1. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/aicpav2/aag-slg/aag-slg/aag-slg_supp/acc_10_appendix_f___illustrations_of_allocation_methods_active/acc_10_appendix_f_illustrations_of_allocation_methods_Physical_Units_Method_active.html
  2. https://www.accountingformanagement.org/quantitative-unit-method-of-joint-cost-allocation/
  3. https://www.financestrategists.com/accounting/cost-accounting/joint-cost-allocation-methods/

FAQs

What is the physical units method?

The physical units method, also known as the quantitative unit method, is a cost allocation method used to distribute joint costs among various products produced through a common production process. It allocates costs based on the measurement units of the products, such as tons, gallons, pounds, or feet.

Why is selecting an appropriate allocation basis important?

Selecting an appropriate allocation basis is crucial to ensure accurate and fair cost allocation. The allocation basis should be relevant to the products and reflect their relative contribution to the overall production process.

What are the key components of the physical units method?

The key components of the physical units method include:

  • Allocation Basis: The measurement units used to allocate joint costs, such as tons, gallons, pounds, or feet.
  • Measurable Products: All joint products must be quantifiable using a common unit of measurement.
  • Allocation Calculation: Joint costs are allocated to each product based on its proportionate share of the total quantity produced.

How is the allocation calculation performed in the physical units method?

The allocation calculation in the physical units method is performed using the following formula:

(Quantity of each product / Total quantity of all products) * Total joint costs

What are some examples of measurement units commonly used in the physical units method?

Common examples of measurement units used in the physical units method include:

  • Tons: Used for products like coal, steel, and cement.
  • Gallons: Used for products like oil, milk, and beverages.
  • Pounds: Used for products like meat, cheese, and candy.
  • Feet: Used for products like lumber, fabric, and carpets.

Why is it important to use a common unit of measurement for all joint products?

Using a common unit of measurement for all joint products is important to ensure consistency and comparability in the allocation process. It allows for a direct comparison of the quantities of different products and facilitates the calculation of their proportionate share of the total joint costs.

What are some situations where conversion to a common denominator is necessary?

Conversion to a common denominator is necessary when some joint products cannot be directly measured using the same unit of measurement. For example, if one product is measured in tons and another in gallons, they need to be converted to a common unit like pounds or cubic meters to enable allocation.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the physical units method?

Advantages:

  • Simplicity and ease of application.
  • Objectivity and lack of subjectivity.

Disadvantages:

  • May not be suitable when products have significantly different values or characteristics.
  • Ignores qualitative factors that may affect product costs.