Kirkpatrick’s Level 2 evaluation model assesses the extent to which training program participants have improved their knowledge and skills as a result of the training (Kirkpatrick, 1996). This level of evaluation is crucial for determining the relevance and quality of training programs and the suitability of the assessments and evaluation instruments used.
Key Facts
- Purpose: The purpose of a Level 2 evaluation is to determine whether participants have acquired the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment as a result of the training.
- Key Questions: Level 2 evaluations seek to answer questions such as:
- Did the participants learn what was intended to be taught?
- What is the extent of advancement or change in the participants after the training?
- Were there any particular barriers to or promoters of learning?
- Data Collection Methods: Level 2 evaluations are typically conducted using pre- and post-training assessments or tests to measure the learning gain. Other data collection methods may include interviews with participants, participant self-assessments, and group or peer assessments.
- Calculation of Learning Gain: The learning gain can be calculated by subtracting the pre-learning score from the post-learning score, dividing it by the difference between the maximum score and the pre-learning score, and multiplying it by 100.
Purpose of Level 2 Evaluation
The primary purpose of a Level 2 evaluation is to determine whether participants have acquired the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment as a result of the training. This evaluation level helps organizations understand the effectiveness of their training programs in achieving their intended learning objectives.
Key Questions Addressed by Level 2 Evaluation
Level 2 evaluations seek to answer specific questions related to the learning outcomes of the training program. These questions include:
- Did the participants learn what was intended to be taught?
- What is the extent of advancement or change in the participants after the training?
- Were there any particular barriers to or promoters of learning?
Data Collection Methods for Level 2 Evaluation
Level 2 evaluations typically employ pre- and post-training assessments or tests to measure the learning gain. These assessments can be conducted in various formats, such as multiple-choice quizzes, open-ended questions, or practical exercises.
In addition to assessments, other data collection methods may be used to gather information about participants’ learning outcomes. These methods include:
- Interviews with participants to gain their perspectives on the training and their learning experiences.
- Participant self-assessments, where participants reflect on their knowledge and skills acquired during the training.
- Group or peer assessments, where participants evaluate each other’s learning and provide feedback.
Calculating Learning Gain
The learning gain from training can be calculated using the following formula:
Learning Gain = ((Post-learning Score – Pre-learning Score) / (Maximum Score – Pre-learning Score)) x 100
This formula helps quantify the improvement in participants’ knowledge and skills as a result of the training program.
Conclusion
Kirkpatrick’s Level 2 evaluation model provides a structured approach to assessing the learning outcomes of training programs. By measuring the extent to which participants have acquired the intended knowledge and skills, organizations can make informed decisions about the effectiveness of their training programs and make necessary improvements to enhance learning and achieve desired outcomes.
References
- Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- TrainingCheck. (n.d.). Level 2 – Learning. Retrieved from https://www.trainingcheck.com/help-centre-2/guide-to-training-evaluation/creating-evaluations-at-the-different-levels/level-2-learning/
- Tribal Habits. (2023). Measuring training understanding Kirkpatrick Level 2 Learning. Retrieved from https://tribalhabits.com/measuring-kirkpatrick-level-2-learning/
- Public Health Foundation. (n.d.). Kirkpatrick Level 2 (Learning). Retrieved from https://www.phf.org/programs/preparednessresponse/evaluationrepository/Pages/Introduction_Methods_Overview_Section_2.aspx
FAQs
What is the purpose of a Level 2 evaluation?
A Level 2 evaluation aims to assess the extent to which training participants have acquired the intended knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and commitment as a result of the training.
What are the key questions addressed by a Level 2 evaluation?
Level 2 evaluations seek to answer questions such as:
- Did the participants learn what was intended to be taught?
- What is the extent of advancement or change in the participants after the training?
- Were there any particular barriers to or promoters of learning?
What data collection methods are used in a Level 2 evaluation?
Level 2 evaluations typically employ pre- and post-training assessments or tests to measure learning gain. Other data collection methods may include interviews with participants, participant self-assessments, and group or peer assessments.
How is learning gain calculated in a Level 2 evaluation?
Learning gain is calculated using the following formula:
Learning Gain = ((Post-learning Score – Pre-learning Score) / (Maximum Score – Pre-learning Score)) x 100
What is the significance of Level 2 evaluation in training programs?
Level 2 evaluation is crucial for determining the effectiveness of training programs in achieving their intended learning objectives. It helps organizations identify areas where the training was successful and areas that need improvement.
How can organizations use the results of a Level 2 evaluation?
Organizations can use the results of a Level 2 evaluation to make informed decisions about their training programs. They can identify areas where the training was effective and replicate those elements in future programs. They can also identify areas where the training was less effective and make changes to improve those aspects.
What are some common challenges in conducting a Level 2 evaluation?
Some common challenges in conducting a Level 2 evaluation include:
- Ensuring that the assessments used are valid and reliable measures of learning.
- Getting participants to complete pre- and post-training assessments.
- Collecting meaningful data from interviews and self-assessments.
How can organizations overcome the challenges in conducting a Level 2 evaluation?
Organizations can overcome the challenges in conducting a Level 2 evaluation by:
- Working with experts to develop valid and reliable assessments.
- Providing incentives to participants to complete pre- and post-training assessments.
- Using clear and concise instructions for interviews and self-assessments.