Positives of NAFTA
NAFTA led to a significant increase in trade between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Trade between the three countries grew from approximately $290 billion in 1993 to over $1.1 trillion in 2016. [1]
Key Facts
- Increased Trade: NAFTA led to a significant increase in trade between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Trade between the three countries grew from approximately $290 billion in 1993 to over $1.1 trillion in 2016.
- Lower Prices: One of the main benefits of NAFTA was the lowering of tariffs, which resulted in lower prices for consumer goods. This allowed average Americans to benefit from reduced prices and increased purchasing power.
- GDP Growth: NAFTA added 0.5% to the U.S. GDP once implemented, contributing around $80 billion to the economy. This growth helped stimulate the overall economy.
- Diplomatic Relations: NAFTA strengthened diplomatic ties between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The increased economic interconnection between the countries led to more frequent meetings between the heads of state and a higher value placed on diplomatic relations.
- Job Creation: NAFTA created export-related jobs, with nearly 200,000 jobs being created annually. These jobs paid higher wages compared to the manufacturing jobs that moved out of the U.S. post-NAFTA.
Negatives:
- Job Losses: NAFTA led to the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs, particularly in the auto sector. Approximately 350,000 jobs were lost in the U.S. auto sector between 1994 and 2016, while Mexico gained over 400,000 jobs in the same period.
- Impact on Mexican Farmers and Small Business Owners: NAFTA had a negative impact on small farmers in Mexico who struggled to compete with larger agribusinesses. Many family-owned farms folded, and workers had to seek employment in factories with lower wages and inferior working conditions.
- Wage Suppression: While the manufacturing sector suffered job losses, wages also decreased in other sectors that didn’t require a college degree. Competition from lower-wage workers in Mexico exerted downward pressure on wages for non-college-educated workers in the U.S..
- Environmental and Labor Standards: Critics argue that NAFTA’s environmental and labor standards could have been higher. The U.S. missed an opportunity to push for more stringent protections for workers and the environment during the negotiation process.
One of the main benefits of NAFTA was the lowering of tariffs, which resulted in lower prices for consumer goods. This allowed average Americans to benefit from reduced prices and increased purchasing power. [2]
NAFTA added 0.5% to the U.S. GDP once implemented, contributing around $80 billion to the economy. This growth helped stimulate the overall economy. [3]
NAFTA strengthened diplomatic ties between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The increased economic interconnection between the countries led to more frequent meetings between the heads of state and a higher value placed on diplomatic relations. [4]
NAFTA created export-related jobs, with nearly 200,000 jobs being created annually. These jobs paid higher wages compared to the manufacturing jobs that moved out of the U.S. post-NAFTA. [5]
Negatives of NAFTA
NAFTA led to the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs, particularly in the auto sector. Approximately 350,000 jobs were lost in the U.S. auto sector between 1994 and 2016, while Mexico gained over 400,000 jobs in the same period. [6]
NAFTA had a negative impact on small farmers in Mexico who struggled to compete with larger agribusinesses. Many family-owned farms folded, and workers had to seek employment in factories with lower wages and inferior working conditions. [7]
While the manufacturing sector suffered job losses, wages also decreased in other sectors that didn’t require a college degree. Competition from lower-wage workers in Mexico exerted downward pressure on wages for non-college-educated workers in the U.S.. [8]
Critics argue that NAFTA’s environmental and labor standards could have been higher. The U.S. missed an opportunity to push for more stringent protections for workers and the environment during the negotiation process. [9]
Sources
[1] https://www.smartasset.com/mortgage/the-pros-and-cons-of-nafta
[2] https://library.unt.edu/gpo/oca/nafta.htm
[3] https://www.exploros.com/summary/NAFTA-Pros-and-Cons
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] https://www.smartasset.com/mortgage/the-pros-and-cons-of-nafta
[7] https://library.unt.edu/gpo/oca/nafta.htm
[8] https://www.smartasset.com/mortgage/the-pros-and-cons-of-nafta
[9] Ibid.
FAQs
What are the positives of NAFTA?
NAFTA led to increased trade, lower prices, GDP growth, stronger diplomatic relations, and job creation.
What are the negatives of NAFTA?
NAFTA led to job losses in certain industries, wage suppression, and lower environmental and labor standards.
How did NAFTA impact trade?
NAFTA led to a significant increase in trade between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Trade between the three countries grew from approximately $290 billion in 1993 to over $1.1 trillion in 2016.
How did NAFTA impact prices?
NAFTA led to lower prices for consumer goods due to the reduction and elimination of tariffs.
How did NAFTA impact the U.S. economy?
NAFTA added 0.5% to the U.S. GDP once implemented, contributing around $80 billion to the economy.
How did NAFTA impact jobs?
NAFTA led to the loss of some manufacturing jobs in the United States, particularly in the auto sector. However, it also created new jobs in export-related industries.
How did NAFTA impact the environment?
Critics argue that NAFTA’s environmental standards could have been higher. The U.S. missed an opportunity to push for more stringent protections for the environment during the negotiation process.
How did NAFTA impact labor standards?
Critics also argue that NAFTA’s labor standards could have been higher. The U.S. missed an opportunity to push for more stringent protections for workers during the negotiation process.